Gravity. Is it really a pulling force?János Rohán, Szeged, Hungary
Did you know a better evidence?..... Click the link for more information. An apple falls to the ground. Therefore, it is stated, the Earth pullsSir Isac Newton: The Universal law of Gravitation ..... Click the link for more information. the apple. And with that the evidence is exhausted* Jump to details The basis of the experimental verification is the fact that all attempts to demonstrate gravity push have failed. ..... Click the link for more information. However, the apple will likewise fall if the force does not pull it down, but pushes it down.
To satisfy this latter condition, we need the assumption that space is not empty, but is filled with gravity. This does not seem such a fantastic idea today if we remember that cosmologists recently presumed that the Universe is filled with dark energy
It is obvious that the Universe is filled with electromagnetic radiation, and the (vacuum) space is assumed to be filled with Higgs bosons Bosons are particles which form totally-symmetric composite quantum states. The spin-statistics theorem states that bosons have integer spin. Bosons are the only particles which can occupy the same state as one another. All elementary particles are either bosons or fermions. Numerous problems of cosmologists would be solved if gravity were not regarded as a pulling force. The idea of pushing gravity is not a recent one: it reaches back as far as Georges-Louis Le Sage (1724-1803). If gravity is a pushing force, mass will not emit, but absorb gravitational waves. 1. Let us consider the recently discovered accelerating movement of distant galaxies. With pulling gravity, this seems impossible to explain, but if we consider gravity as a property of space, which would like to compress everything, the accelerating movement become logical as this compressing force would remain unresisted at the edge of the Universe: no pushing force acts from outside, so the pushing force of the Universe will accelerate the most outlying galaxies. No assumption of any antigravitational effect is necessary. 2. The problem of singularity, which arises only with the pulling gravity model, will also be avoidable. Let us consider the Earth, for example. As an object moves closer to the Earth, the gravitational force becomes higher. This is true as long as the Earth is regarded as a point. However, the Earth is not a point. In theory, the object can pass below the surface, towards the centre of the Earth. The cause of the gravitational force is not a single point, but the whole mass of the Earth, which at the centre is in equilibrium, so no gravitational force is acting at the centre of the Earth. According to the pulling gravity model, the density at the centre of a black hole would become infinite and the mathematical consequence would be singularity. It appears more logical, therefore, that the pulling force does not become infinite by large as we go toward the centre of a black hole, but, on the contrary, decreases. Moreover, with the pushing gravity model, there is no need for the singularity concept, because the pressure at the centre of a black hole depends on the nearly constant gravitational field of the Universe, so gravity does not increase infinitely. (If it is presumed that gravity is totally absorbed on passing through the mass of a black hole, the pressures at the centre of a smallNot a proton size!!! Minimal mass of a black hole is at least 1.4 Sun and a huge black hole should be the same.) 3. With the pushing gravity model, the mystery would be solved of why no matter or radiation can leave the event horizon of a black hole, but all kinds of matter can still be pulled in. How can any force come out if nothing can come out? This problem would not arise with the pushing gravity model, because gravity then streams inwards, and the force is also directed inwards. 4. It could similarly solve the mystery of why the larger planets emit considerably more heat than they receive from the Sun. The surplus energy emitted should be generated by the planets themselves, but radioactivity or heating by tidal forces do not seem to offer sufficient explanation of the excess heat radiation. It appears simpler to conceive that the planets probably gain their surplus energy by the absorption of gravitational radiation. 5. The same logic could easily explain why astronomers have not found white dwarfs cooler than 3400 K. They can not cool more because they receive a constant energy supply by absorbing gravitational radiation. The temperature of neutron stars should be higher in consequence of their greater mass. Cosmologists state that 13 Gyears was not sufficient for the white dwarfs to cool down. The problem is that the Universe must be at least twice as old as this: if we really see galaxies at a distance of 13 Glightyears and if the Universe was formed by a Big Bang (both statements are widely accepted), at least 13 Gyears should have passed for the galaxy to take up the position where the light was emitted. The photons then travelled for a further 13 Gyears towards the Earth, where the Hubble Space Telescope captured this ancient light. Consequently, the Universe is at least 26 Gyears old.
6. To return to heat emission, we usually do not put the question of why the Earth has not cooled down 7. During the star formation process, cosmic gas clouds contract and heat up. But where does the energy originate from? The heat generation can be explained if, for example, the external gravitational field performs work on the nebula. It is true that, when we compress a gas, its temperature increases, but in that case we supply energy from outside, as when a bicycle pump warms up when we use it. If we do not exert pressure on it, it will never warm up. Another perspective: in an otherwise empty vacuum, we cannot imagine what would drive atoms.
8. An impossible property of the graviton, the negative impulse, is similarly solved. Are we to expect that the graviton then pulls the Moon back?Yes, its possible, if the graviton is a crook headed rubber particle, catching the Moon, and pull it toward the Earth, like a fisherman... This kind of collision contradicts all known physical laws, nonsense indeed. Graviton, even if it is an energy package, particle or wave, should have negative mass, negative velocity or negative energy in the pulling gravity model. As all three properties are physical impossibility, this exclude the reason for existence of pulling gravity model alone. Therefore gravity exists in the vacuum space and pushes anything down to earth, because Earth absorbs some gravitational waves coming from beneath direction.
Thus, the pushing gravity model appears suitable to explain numerous observations, whereas the pulling gravity model is not. *
The basis of the experimental verification is the fact that all attempts to demonstrate gravity push have failed. The wrong conclusion is that it does not exist. In turn, Dark Energy completely suit the requirements of pushing gravity.
Reference Le Sage Theory of Push Gravity Force, Pull Gravitational force from Space, not from Earth, which only absorb this waves. The Universe is filled with Nikola Tesla Gravitation is a property of vacuum, revealed by the matter
|
Composition of the Universe. Source Ann Feild, STSCI
Volcano Kilauea, Hawaii 
